Last summer NIH issued a new consultation on open access – it may be found at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-25-138.html – and then offered stakeholders the opportunity to give their views on the five main options they suggested, each of which is aimed at cutting down OA publishing costs. The views – which were very varied – mayContinueContinue reading “The NIH Consultation: Views from Europe and around the world”
Tag Archives: Brigitte Shull
Ave et Vale, Brigitte!
[written by Brigitte Shull] Next week I will return to Springer Nature, joining the OA team. It isn’t goodbye to Gold Leaf though, I’m hopeful that there will be more opportunities for me to collaborate with Linda and Annika Bennett again. I’ve done so for the past 13 years, first as a client at CambridgeContinueContinue reading “Ave et Vale, Brigitte!”
Losing the Forest Through the Trees: Bringing the Goals of the OA Movement Back into Focus
After looking through this year’s OA Week events, I made a note to come back to a few events like “All research results should be made public. CHANGE MY MIND!”. While there were other events that were both eye-catching and worthwhile in the events roster, there was a noticeable lack of content on furthering theContinueContinue reading “Losing the Forest Through the Trees: Bringing the Goals of the OA Movement Back into Focus”
Opening up about Open Access: interview with Brigitte Shull
Q: What stage do you think Open Access has reached today? A: I’m so glad that it’s no longer “why” for Open Access, but “how”. A large cross-section of the publishing industry had to keep on making the case for OA and the process seemed endless. Now we can direct our energies exclusively towards buildingContinueContinue reading “Opening up about Open Access: interview with Brigitte Shull”
Gold Leaf 